What is wrong with Legal Education?
I wasn't going to post this, but the recent Auto Admit "scandal" makes me want to. I might have some involvement in the case, so I won't comment upon it. I'm no expert on the subject of legal education, but Kennon M. Sheldon and Lawrence S. Krieger claim to be, and did some research to back it up. Their study is available here. Here's some of their best stuff.We would expect, for example, that students are generally seeking quality teaching and that they attend law school to learn to practice law. However, law schools traditionally emphasize theoretical scholarship and the teaching of legal theory, and many hire and reward faculty primarily based on scholarly potential and production. Our findings suggest that schools will benefit from reevaluating faculty priorities regarding such issues and from considering carefully the effect of their teaching methods and practices on students. Changes toward employing faculty with more teaching and lawyering (including public service) experience, offering a balance of practical skills training, or providing more training and rewards for teaching excellence might also ultimately enhance students’ sense of autonomy and engagement.Yes, that is the nice way to say it.
The blunt way to say it? Law school breeds unhappiness because so many law professors are jerks and don't care about their students. And why not? Law school generally rewards only selfish behavior, non-collaboration, and whining. My law school experience was awful. Most of my professors were there to further their outside careers, frequently didn't even show up to class, and were dismissive, belittling, and rude to us.