Search
Close this search box.

FIRST AMENDMENT & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWYERS

RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP is a team of attorneys committed to serving clients in sensitive positions, protecting free speech and adding value to your business.

our focus icon

Our Focus

Our top priority is understanding and addressing the unique goals and challenges of our clients. With personalized legal support, we serve as trusted advisors, offering comprehensive solutions to navigate complex regulations and minimize legal risks. You can rely on us to guide you through any legal obstacles you may encounter—we are here to provide the assistance you need.

core values icon

Core Values

Clients are best served by attorneys with clearly stated, cohesive beliefs. While ours may make our job more difficult, they make our client relationships better. Preserving the First Amendment, neither harming it through action nor inaction. Ethical, honorable and vigorous client representation. 

ethics icon

Ethics

We will not take cases if we think that the proposed course of action will do harm to the Constitution. The firm’s record of spirited, zealous representation of its clients has never, and will never, come at the expense of its ethics.

What we're made of

Rectangle
Play Video
Rectangle

PrACTICE AREAS

RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP is a team of attorneys committed to serving clients in sensitive positions, protecting free speech and adding value to your business.

We represent clients on a wide array of First Amendment issues, copyright and trademark protection and infringement cases, defamation cases, domain name disputes and employment law matters. Above all else, we handle these matters in a way that make clients proud to associate with us.

Worthley

Lawsuit - Worthley

Jeff Worthley filed a lawsuit against the School Committee of Gloucester and Superintendent Ben Lummis in Massachusetts Superior Court. However, the case was moved to the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

Worthley made four allegations in the lawsuit. The first two were based on violations of the First Amendment and Due Process under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, while the other two claims were based on violations of Free Speech and Due Process under G.L. c. 12, § 11.

We are in the arena

“ The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena ”

Recent Articles

From Randazza’s News & Media

In the News

Skip to content