A recent UDRP case, HSBC Finance Corporation v. Clear Blue Sky Inc. and Domain Manager, Case No. D2007-0062 provides a good collection of some typical losing UDRP defenses and shows
In Alpine Entertainment Group v. Walter Alvarez, WIPO Case. D2007-1082 a three-member UDRP panel clarified one circumstance in which a previously unsuccessful UDRP complaint could be re-filed. In the earlier
Freedom to Differ reports that Google is planning to stop monetizing all domains that are less than five days old. (source) This should make domain tasting less profitable and should
ICANN finally figured out that domain tasting is a pain in the ass. You can read the 57 page report here, or just take my word for it.
I don’t know what the ICANN Ombudsman does. I still can’t really figure it out by reading the 2007 ICANN Ombudsman Report. I do find it interesting that it cites
The Arbitration Court at the Polish Chamber of Information Technology and Telecommunication (PCITT) has ruled in favor of Google in a dispute over the gmail.com.pl domain name. (The PCITT is
It really is too bad that the UDRP is not more consistently applied to personal names. The Policy was supposed to decrease the number of domain name disputes that wound
Dear Lord, call Steve Dallas! The Bolsheviks still have a TLD!
It seems like this is a little more of a megillah than I thought. There is more to the kemf between Google v. Jewtube than meets the eyes… it seems
Marty Schwimmer reports on another Politician Domain Name Case. Apparently, the defendant in that case owns a collection of domain names that correlate to the names of local politicians. He
This is a stickup: Give me your Web site or else!
Due to, well, just really REALLY stupid litigation strategy (as in not showing up at all), one of the best known online gambling websites, Bodog, no longer owns its own
