The analyst has it dead-on correct. Bill O’Reilly is, as usual, dead wrong.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCSaF4KC3eE]
The analyst does gloss over one detail in 18 U.S.C. s 1030 — that the hacker needs to have done $5,000 worth of damage to be subject to the statute. However, I don’t think that she should be criticized for that — when you are on a sound bite program, you need to do away with some details. She knows her stuff.
