Close this search box.

Palinland Hates the First Amendment

A New South Wales judge ruled that images like this one are "child pornography" under Australian law
If Aaron Sperbeck has his way, this image will be illegal in Alaska

I spent a summer in Alaska and loved it. I saw no indication of a people who would be dumb enough to elect Sarah Palin. I guess I didn’t pay attention. There is a prosecutor there who doesn’t care that the Supreme Court has already ruled that non-obscene “child porn” that does not depict real children is protected by the First Amendment. See Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002).

He wants to make it illegal to produce or possess mere cartoons that depict children in sexual activity. (source)

Skip to content